To make the organs easy to build, one compromise that John Smith had to make
in his organ plans was to use single-acting bellows. Commercial organs almost
always use double-acting bellows which supply air on both the down stroke
and the up stroke. John got around this by using two bellows working in
opposition, which has the same effect; but each bellows is only half the
width, so the whole system only supplies half the wind of a conventional
Double-acting bellows are quite difficult to make for the home builder. There
are complicated blocks of wood to machine, and internal wind channels to
drill, and the geometry is more complex. But after much thought, I have come
up with a double-acting bellows system which can be built just as easily
as the John Smith single-acting one. My system will supply approximately
twice as much wind as the John Smith system, and it only needs a single crank
to operate it.
I have never seen this idea before, but I do not claim to have invented it.
In the hundreds of years that organs have been built, I am quite sure that
somebody else must have thought of this before me! I woud be interested
to learn if anybody has ever seen this idea before.
Like John's system, my system consists of two separate bellows and a reservoir,
but instead of opposing each other, the bellows are connected together and
go up and down together. The clever bit is that one of the bellows is mounted
upside down and feeds air into the top of the reservoir from above! Both
the bellows and the reservoir are full width. The two bellows are connected
together by a connecting rod and, because one of the bellows is upside-down,
when the bottom bellows is open the top one is closed, and vice versa.
The reservoir is sandwiched between the two bellows, in such a way that the
reservoir boards also form the bellows boards. So only four boards are required,
as opposed to five in the standard system: 1) Bellows 1 moveable board; 2)
Reservoir top board; 3) Reservoir bottom board; 4) Bellows 2 moveable board.
The hinge end of the reservoir is at the opposite end from the bellows hinges,
so that as the reservoir opens and closes it does not affect the opening
and closing of the bellows.
Here is a sketch of the idea:
|The bellows and reservoir are all made using the same simple
techniques as used in the plans. Both bellows are identical, and they
have simple geometry with both boards being of equal length and converging
to a point. Each bellows still has access to the outside air, and feeds air
into the reservoir by a flap valve, just like the standard system. The only
significant difference is the way one of the bellows is mounted on top of
Only a single crank is required, which makes the crankshaft considerably
easier to make, and this is connected to the bottom bellows, as standard.
Because of the various fitments required on the reservoir (the output connection,
the relief valve, and the pressure spring) it is necessary for the opening
end of the reservoir to project slightly beyond the bellows, to provide space
for these fitments. So the reservoir will need to be slightly bigger than
the bellows (which is not a bad thing!).
In practice, I found that the best arrangement was to take the output connection
from the reservoir top board and also mount the whole assembly by the reservoir
top board so that the output conection doesn't move (as shown in the above
diagram). This means that the reservoir bottom board is the one that moves
up and down and the one which carries the relief valve. There is no
reason why the system can't be mounted by the reservoir bottom board and
allow the top board to move up and down.
The photos below show a demonstration version that I knocked up quickly out
of scrap materials to prove whether the idea worked or not. It was
cut out of a scrap chipboard shelf and some blackout cloth! The dimensions
are random and based on the materials I had available.
|These are the four boards required. The bellows boards on the left,
the reservoir boards on the right. Ignore the very small holes, they don't
go all the way through!
||The flap valves and relief valve are fitted. Battens are fitted
around the outside of the reservoir boards to act as the 'missing' bellows
boards. The large hole is the outlet hole
This is how the boards will be arranged. The reservoir is in the middle,
and the two bellows are on top and bottom
Covered with blackout cloth. 'The connecting rods have been fitted, and
the two battens along the side are for mounting the whole thing into the
organ. (See note below)
| Another view. Note the outlet hole, and the cut-out in the battens
to allow the connecting rods to pass through
||I knocked up a quick demonstration rig to test it. Note the make-shift
pressure spring underneath the reservoir!
Watch the demonstration
In this video, the relief valve is not operational. The outlet hole is
half open in order to demonstrate the rise and fall of the reservoir within
safe limits. In fact, the pressure relief valve turned out to be much
too small to cope with all the surplus wind, even when fully open. I
wasn't expecting so much wind to be produced!
The two bellows could be made as completely separate units, each with two
boards, and then each bellows glued onto the reservoir when finished. This
would make construction even more similar to the John Smith plans, but would
be quite wasteful of wood, and needlessly heavy.
I used solid boards for the construction, but you could just as easily use
thin boards with battens around the edges, as in the plans.
When covering, cover the reservoir first and leave to dry. Then cover
one of the bellows, then the other one.
The connecting rods must be at the corners, otherwise when the reservoir
opens it will restrict the movement of the bellows.
Instead of the mounting battens at the side, a neater way of mounting it
would be to extend the top reservoir board at both the crank end and the
hinge end, and mount it by these extensions. A cut-out would need to be made
for the connecting rod to pass through to the crankshaft, just like in the
original plans. Having already made the reservoir, I couldn't use this method,
but I will do it like this in the future.
In my demo, the pressure spring is at the opening end of the reservoir, which
is not the best position. It should really be about half-way along.
This can easily be achieved by making the top bellows slightly narrower than
the reservoir, and mounting one pressure spring on each side of the reservoir.
The springs can then be moved backwards or forwards as required for adjustment.
Note that only a single crank is required, which is a great benefit for those
without engineering facilities, as the crank can be a simple one on the end
of the crankshaft.
This bellows assembly is slightly taller than the John Smith bellows, but
they provide almost double the wind because both bellows are full width.
Therefore they are not direct replacements for those in John Smith's plans.
To use these bellows you would need to increase the height of the case
slightly for them to fit. They could possibly be made to fit in place
of the standard bellows by reducing the opening angle and the stroke of the
crank, and even then they would still provide more wind. It's up to
you to experiment!
I would not recommend anybody use my design when making their first organ.
Stick to the plans to get the experience necessary. Then perhaps experiment
with my design on subsequent organs. They would work well in the Universal,
as that is rather short of wind when all the stops are pulled!
Note that these bellows are not quite as neat as conventional double-acting
bellows because they take up a bit more room. But they are much easier to
make and they do supply roughly the same amount of wind. Other advantages
are that the outlet port is stationary so the air connection can be fixed;
and the relief valve is mounted upside down so that it is held closed by
the air pressure and by gravity. No spring required.
Major update coming soon!
Back to the Articles Index
This web site is copyright (C) Melvyn
Wright and individual contributors